JAMES TONEY FIGHTS MMA STAR RANDY COUTURE

August 27th, 2010 By Sammy Perez

New York, NY- An historical fight will take place at UFC 118 this Saturday between five-time UFC champion and MMA legend Randy Couture and multiple division boxing champion James Toney. Thus, the stage is set for an epic showdown. So why are boxing and MMA still fighting for respect?

FIGHTING’S BEEN AROUND SINCE CAVEMEN

Combat sports have probably been around since the dawn of mankind. There are ancient artifacts and historical data that dictate hand to hand combat and certain forms of self-defense have been practiced in one form or another for thousands of years.

PRIZE FIGHTING KOSHER OR BARBARIC?

Yet, for as long as they’ve been around, the question remains, are combat sports an athletic form of competition or nothing more than barbaric brutality? For the sport of boxing, this question has lingered for well over a century, but for the sport of mixed martial arts this debate has only been going on for a little more than a decade and a half. As a fan, proponent and practitioner of both, I’m here to speak on the positive and technical aspects of each. You can call it the beauty behind the brutality.

BEAUTY IN THE MODE OF DESTRUCTION

Now some people might ask, “how can something so violent, be considered beautiful?” To answer this question, one needs to look beyond what they just see and understand the facets of the game. First of all, violence, in terms of sport, is defined as “rough or injurious physical force, action or treatment.” Therefore, one would have to define a lot of sports as violent.

DOES THE “COLOR” FACTOR IMPACT FIGHT OPINIONS?

Some of the most popular sports in this country such as football, hockey, and basketball can be construed as violent. For that matter, not so popular sports such as soccer, field hockey and lacrosse are just as “violent.” So why are these accepted forms of competition within our society, but boxing and mixed martial arts are frowned upon by so many?

OTHER CONTACT SPORTS WHERE HITS ARE COOL!

It is a lack of knowledge and understanding. On the football field, when a player is gang tackled by a host of players, it is referred to as great team defense. In hockey, when a player is checked hard into the wall or the ice, it is looked upon as exciting. Even in baseball, when a player slides directly into the shortstop or second baseman in an effort to break up a double play, it is understood as an accepted part of the game.

DIFFERENCE OF OPINION: BEAUTY OR BEASTLY?

Yet, when a fighter throws a jab at another fighter’s head, it is considered “violent.” Many others and I on the other hand look at this as a thing of beauty. It is why boxing has long been referred to as the “sweet science.” When heavyweights such as Muhammad Ali can dance gracefully around their opponent’s attack or Larry Holmes spitfires a jab through someone’s defense with such speed and precision, it is something to behold.

LIKE SHORTHAND, FIGHTING IS A LEARNED CRAFT

It is a skill, an art form they were able to master after years of long and arduous training. Granted, back in the days of bare-knuckle fighters there probably wasn’t much skill, but that is not the case today. Boxing has had over 100 years to hone its craft and develop a system and standard that should be respected and marveled at.

MARGARITO LICENSE DOESN’T HELP CAUSE

Yet, after all that time boxing is still fighting an uphill battle. Like any other sport, it’s had its setbacks. The reality that, professional fighters have died or suffered career ending injuries in the ring does exist. Then there is Antonio Margarito, a man caught cheating in a most heinous manner, being licensed this week in Texas.

HATE THE “G” BUT BOXING STILL NEEDS FED COMMISSION

However, I’ll argue that most of these are due to the ineptitude of referees that are employed by the various states boxing commissions. Independent state commissions are probably the biggest problem; a uniform set of rules and regulations set forth by a national commission needs to and should be implemented.

MMA HAS MADE INCREDIBLE IMPACT

Mixed martial arts, on the other hand, has only been in existence, as a sport for less than 17 years. It initially developed as a spectacle pitting combatants of various martial arts against each other to see which self-defense system could be considered the most effective. While I’ll admit in the beginning it was nothing short of brutal. Inevitably its initial champions Royce Gracie, Dan Severn and Oleg Taktarov all showed that technique, not brutality, is what eventually would work in a fight.

THE CAGE THROWS THE SQUARES OFF!

Their masterful backgrounds in jiu-jitsu, wrestling and Sambo respectively is what worked, yet in time even they realized their skills were limited against someone who knew a little of everything. Thus, cross training in the various forms of self-defense began and “mixed martial arts” was born. Because it takes place in a cage versus a ring some observers consider it barbaric and have gone so far as to refer to it as “human cock-fighting.” I beg to differ.

MMA HAS LOTS OF TECHNIQUES TO LEARN

I’ve been training in martial arts for over ten years now. While the base of my training has been in taikwando, submission grappling, boxing and Muay Thai, among others, has also been a substantial part of my training. My participation in all these forms of discipline has introduced me to the scientific aspects of each and thus a deep appreciation of what goes on in the cage or the ring.

RARE DEATHS & LESS BRAIN TRAUMA THAN BOXING

Regarding MMA, rules and regulations have been set in place and only two deaths have been documented in its nearly 17 year history. Both of those took place at the lower level of promotion and competition where standards of regulation may have been compromised. Unlike boxing where a fighter depends on the referee to stop a fight, in MMA, besides the ref, a fighter can respectfully and gracefully “tapout,” which means they give up, to live and fight another day.

MMA, LOVE IT OR….?

Yet, with all these rules in place along with skill and training involved, many people continue frowning upon these sports as nothing more than simplistic brutal forms of competition. Beyond that, a debate is forming as the media, fans and even the fighters themselves are now beginning to form a divide as they question whether the rapid growth of MMA will supersede boxing in terms of popularity. Some even question whether MMA will be the death of boxing.

ANCIENT BOXER VS. ANCIENT MMA FIGHTER

Thus, this weekend’s fight between Couture and Toney is not just about two competitors, but rather it has become a fight between the two sports. As a fan of both, I am happy to see each continue to prosper financially because as long as they do, neither of them is going anywhere. Thus, the only battle these two sports will continue to wage is the one against mainstream acceptance of each as such.

“Slammin’ Sammy” Perez

COMMENTS

  1. I will say this, if Toney can avoid a take down for 30 seconds he will KO Randy Couture. Toney was not a puncher, but with the smaller gloves, if he connects within those 30 seconds he could land follow up punches and finish Randy.

    For Randy to win is pretty simple, get the take down and finish Toney up before Toney can test Randy’s punch drunk chin.

    Jesustheprophet on August 27th, 2010 at 2:14 PM
  2. In MMA you do not get to punch at full strength because you are barefoot, so you do not get as much leverage. Even if Toney lands a KO punch he still needs to go to the ground and finish him. Randy Couture can just lay on the ground until he recovers. On the other hand, if Couture takes Toney to the ground once, that is the end of the fight. Toney will never be able to get back up.

    Emilio on August 27th, 2010 at 7:52 PM
  3. This fight means nothing if couture wins. If toney wins, it means everything

    Tommy on August 28th, 2010 at 12:27 AM
  4. As much as I would love to see Toney KO couture the chances of mma rookie beating a legend is slim and none. Lights out started at middleweight and was not the puncher mma fans seem to think. Let’s face the facts James toney is a fat juiced up middleweight who’s old. Can’t teach n old dog new tricks.

    Bender on August 28th, 2010 at 4:28 AM
  5. Bender,
    Thank you for stating what NOBODY is talking about in the build up to this fight, that James Toney is not a natural Heavy. In boxing as a heavy, sure he can beat second rate fighters such as Johnny Luiz and an ancient, battleworn Holyfield, but when he faces a good heavyweight like a motivated Hasim Rahman it is obvious he’s in over his head. Now he is going into an entirely different sport as a heavyweight? Doesn’t look good. I think Randy takes his shots rather well(I hope I’m wrong though).

    David on August 28th, 2010 at 9:12 AM
  6. I saw this comment on a message board somewhere so I cannot take credit for it but I have to share it

    “…James Toney, the secret love child of Fat Albert and Mush Mouth…”

    David on August 28th, 2010 at 9:17 AM
  7. I know Toney’s chances are slim but I REALLY hope he manages to knock Couture the F out and then gloat’s during the interview that boxing reigns supreme and then proceeds to take away the mic from Rogan and throw it to the floor. lol

    Danny on August 28th, 2010 at 9:28 AM
  8. This fight is a joke just like the UFC is. The only way to prove that UFC is superior to boxing is for couture to step into the ring with toney, if he beats him, he has a valid point. Otherwise, get the f outta here. This fight proves nothing other than it is a UFC fight with UFC rules.

    Tommy on August 28th, 2010 at 11:30 PM
  9. Toney has no chance unless Couture makes some big error. I’ve boxed and wresteld, you can’t compare the two. Toney’s discipline has 1,000 rules that aren’t going to be in effect. If Couture gets a leg, which is easy, it’s over. If Couture gets close enough he’ll just grab Toney’s arm, then where’s Toney? You can’t “box” when someone’s grabbing your leg or your arm.

    I’m sure Toney has better punching form than Couture but he probably doesn’t even hit that much harder. He’s very, very skillful and a great boxing technician, but unless Toney lands a miracle shot he has virtually no chance in my opinion.

    RingWalk on August 29th, 2010 at 6:37 AM
  10. Toney lost..now all of this nonsense debate can stop…I a pro field hockey player decided to go and play ice hockey do you think he’d do well? I am surprised Toney lasted a whole 3:19 seconds. I have to say though Toney either has a lot opf balls or is just really arrogant or both to get in there against Corture. Based on Tonedy’s flabby 237 pounds he just wasn’t in thr greatest shape but really none of that mattered. He was out of his element.Boxers don’t belong in MMA and wrestlers don’t belong in boxing. I don’t see whats sop exciting about MMA either. A fight that lasts 3 minutes with a choke? Not all that entertaining…but hey thats just me. Hard to enjoy wrestling for me.

    KP on August 29th, 2010 at 10:00 AM
  11. it must hurt to realize that without boxing’s rules to protect the purity/narrower skillset of boxing…in a straight up fight, a boxer will often lose to even a mid-level wrestler/grappler.

    sorry, reality sucks. fighting’s not always pretty. i’m sure bare knuckle fights had less technical skill but more grit when it was “pass the hat” in bars/saloons during Dempsey’s day. a different set of skills when the rules change. just like amateur boxers have different skills than professional prizefighters. same sport, but still different b/c the rules are different. Go to a high school wrestling practice, and have a 12 year take you down over and over and tell me that the UFC is a joke.

    TAllagash on August 30th, 2010 at 8:37 AM
  12. And one fight between an mma novice and seasoned pro proves everything does it? How easily your fooled by the ufc propaganda machine.

    Bender on August 31st, 2010 at 3:03 PM

Leave a Reply

Powered by Crowd Ignite